http://www.uic.edu/depts/econ/seminar_papers/singhal.pdf
In the study, "Does Women’s Electoral Victory Increase Political Participation and Success in Future Elections? Evidence from India," the authors investigated the causal relationship between women's success in elections and an increase in women's overall involvement in the political process. The study found that, on some level, seeing female candidates have success in local elections inspired other women to participate and run for office. However, this also produced a negative backlash in some areas where this same success caused an increase in gender discrimination against female candidates and politicians. Still, in the end the study concluded that successful female candidates increase the number of female candidates in subsequent elections by 12 percentage points.
When I read this article it occurred to me that citizens' reaction to women's success in elections isn't that much different than that of citizens in the United States. It seems to me that female candidates tend to be held to a higher standard than male political candidates on some level. Certainly high-profile candidates like Hilary Clinton and Sarah Palin have inspired a younger generation of women to enter politics. But at the same time, they have endured heavy criticism on everything from their hairstyle and clothes, to of course their stances on issues. If the positive affect of successful female politicians in India inspires more women candidates and greater female votershare, one would hope the same positive affect here in the U.S. will one day carry a female presidential candidate to the White House.
Hi Sarah,
ReplyDeleteWomen’s participation in legislature is an interesting topic to investigate.
Six days after the release of the study, “Does Women’s Electoral Victory Increase Political Participation and Success in Future Elections? Evidence from India”, the Rajya Sabha (Council of States with 245 members) passed the Women’s Reservation Bill that reserves 33% of legislative seats in the Lok Sabha (The House of the People with 545 members) and state Assemblies. Only the last step remains - of the Lok Sabha endorsing it, which is expected to be easy with the Congress having a strength of 208, the largest constituent of the UPA's 259 members. (http://www.zeenews.com/news609763.html)
(The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) is a ruling coalition of center-left/centrist political parties heading the government of India. The coalition is led by the Indian National Congress (INC), which is currently the single largest political party in the Lok Sabha. The Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh, and the Council of Ministers are drawn from Members of the UPA. INC’s President, Sonia Gandhi, serves as the Chairwoman of the UPA.) (Wikipedia)
The reserved seats would be allotted by rotation to different constituencies and would be valid for 15 years after the commencement of the Amendment Act. The bill seeks to reserve for women 181 of the 543 seats in the Lok Sabha and 1,370 out of a total of 4,109 seats in the 28 State Assemblies.
Some expressed that the women’s seats reservation should be 50% in line with their population ratio. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rajya-Sabha-passes-Womens-Reservation-Bill/articleshow/5663003.cms)
With this bill, could things finally change—broaden the base of women’s political participation or produce more backlash?
Hi Sarah,
ReplyDeleteToko again.
I did not know around 40 countries in the world (2006 data) have introduced gender quotas in elections to national parliaments, either by means of constitutional amendment or by changing the electoral laws (legal quotas). In more than 50 countries major political parties have voluntarily set out quota provisions in their own statues (party quotas).
Visit this site.
http://www.quotaproject.org/aboutQuotas.cfm